Google Maps control (property) for EPiServer

Since my effort towards making this control final has been somewhat limited lately, I’ve decided to simply release the code at its current stage so that others can play with it and perhaps we can have something decent done together. The control operation is described in my previous article therefore I will not be going much into it any longer. the deployment of it is something worth mention though…

Download the control form here. Extract the contents of the zip file to a folder and attach the project to your solution, make sure you have the proper EPiServer libraries referenced form the project or it may complain about the references being broken.

Once you have it compiling, copy the GoogleMapEditor.ascx, GoogleMapViewer.ascx and the contents of the resources folder to a folder named GoogleMap within your project folder. Also copy the contents of the lang folder to the lang folder of your site.

The controls the property instantiate try to be smart about resolving the location of its files, but the property does not know its location thus if you decide to place the scripts in a folder other than just GoogleMaps in the app main folder, you need to add to your web.config the following:

<add key="CogGoogleMapControlLocation" value="\GoogleMaps\" />

And in web.config you define the API keys for all the addresses the control will be available from as “CogGoogleMapApiKey_%HOSTNAME%” values.

e.g. set for my machine localhost (for me) & dune(for access from other computers within our network):

<add key="CogGoogleMapApiKey_localhost" value="A value generated for 'localhost'" />
<add key="CogGoogleMapApiKey_dune" value="A value generated for 'dune'" />

The controls determine by themselves which key to use based on the http request so that the Google API does not complain about the key being improper.

Other than this the control should be self registering and all you need to do is to add it to your Page Type in the Admin section of the site and add:

<EPiServer:Property ID="GoogleMapData" runat="server" PropertyName="GoogleMapData" />

to the template you want to use it with.

The control really needs an improved support for translation the stuff currently there is used for learning more that than to actually be useful. Should we decide to go further with it, it definitely will be extended.

The scripts used for the DOPE editing are released under GPL (the scripts were originally released with the MediaWiki GoogleMaps editor under the same license). Those scripts although modified slightly are also released under GPL and are NOT a part of the control – they just happen to be used by it. I am still trying to decide what license use with the rest of the control, so be aware that this is still a subject to be changed, for now just feel free to use the code and should you make any changes to it, please feed them back so that I can improve the control further. The control will most probably end up as a part of Epicode, as soon as I get a response on the epicode forums from Steve on how to add them.

To finalize my mini series on the object store I’d like to put a simple page comments library. The library takes care of everything that is required for you to post and retrieve a list of comments. It does not (so far) offer any moderation functionality or even facilitates any comments removal. It’s something that I will most probably be added in the process.

I am in the process of figuring out how I can contribute it through the Community EpiCode effort on CodeResort. As soon as I get some answers from Steve, I’ll get it uploaded there. In the mean time let me document how to start using it.

For the time being you can get the code here or the compiled library with the intellisense help form here.

Posting comments

the posting is somewhat manual in terms of not having a pre-made control for it. Which if you look at the code does not have much sense to have.

All you need to do is put two edit boxes on a page and a submit button, and then bind the action of the submit button to a code looking somewhat like:

protected void SubmitComment(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
    IPageComment newComment =
        PageCommentFactory.createInstance(Guid.Empty,
        string.Format("CommentForPage{0}", CurrentPage.PageLink.ID),
        CurrentPage.PageLink.ID,
        SubjectTextBox.Text, ContentTextBox.Text, DateTime.Now, false, true, false);
    newComment.Save();
}

I honestly don’t feel like making a custom control for creating those would be worthwhile since no one would end up using it anyway.

The listing of comments however…

The comments can be accessed in a number of ways.

Probably the easiest one would be by using the templated control I’ve written in the library, which is a simple descendant of the ASP.NET repeater. The page could would look something like:

...

<%@ Register TagPrefix="CognifideControls"
    Namespace="Cognifide.EPiServerControls.PageComments.Controls"
    Assembly="Cognifide.EPiServerControls.PageComments" %>

...


<CognifideControls:PageCommentsList ID="CommentControl" runat="server"
    PageLinkIdProperty="<%# CurrentPage.PageLink.ID %>">
    <ItemTemplate> 
        <b><%# CommentControl.CurrentComment.Title %></b> - 
        <%# CommentControl.CurrentComment.SubmitDate.ToString() %><br />
        <%# CommentControl.CurrentComment.Content%><br /><br />
    </ItemTemplate>
</CognifideControls:PageCommentsList>

I’ve chose this way since that’s pretty much the standard way of adding controls that are defined in Episerver and just generally ASP.Net.

But nothing stops you from accessing the comments directly,  and then filling in the data for the repeater yourself like:

<asp:Repeater ID="CurrentComments" runat="server" 
    OnItemDataBound="CurrentComments_ItemDataBound"> 
    <ItemTemplate>
        <b><asp:Label ID="CommentSubjectLabel" runat="server"></asp:Label></b><br />
        <asp:Label ID="CommentContentLabel" runat="server"></asp:Label><br /><br />
    </ItemTemplate>
</asp:Repeater>

And then in the code-behind

protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    List<IPageComment> comments =
        PageCommentFactory.GetCommentsForPage(CurrentPage.PageLink.ID, 
        DateTime.MinValue, DateTime.MaxValue, true);
    CurrentComments.DataSource = comments;
    CurrentComments.DataBind();
}

protected void CurrentComments_ItemDataBound(object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e)
{
    IPageComment comment = (e.Item.DataItem as IPageComment);
    Label commentSubjectLabel = (Label)e.Item.FindControl("CommentSubjectLabel");
    if (comment != null)
    {
        commentSubjectLabel.Text = comment.Title;
    }
 
    Label commentContentLabel = (Label)e.Item.FindControl("CommentContentLabel");
    if (comment != null)
    {
        commentContentLabel.Text = comment.Content;
    }
}

That’s pretty much what my implementation does anyway.

I hope to be able to put it up on CodeResort soon so that we can see what else could be done. Additionally my library allows for replacing the persistence provider, which we will probably have implemented using nHibernate to test its speed versus the ObjectStore. Should you be interested in providing some help with this, or adding come moderation code to the admin side of the site on top of the interface, it would definitely be greatly appreciated.

I have started implementing the Property based on the code so that it can be easily displayed on the editor’s page, but for now, I’ll have to delay it since we’ve got some other stuff to do related to the project I’m currently working on.

Posted in ASP.NET, C#, Downloadable, EPiServer, Software Development, Web applications
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)
Loading...
| 3 Comments »

EPiServer?s ObjectStore (Part 2)

I think we’re mostly finished investigating ObjectStore for now. In this article I’ll try to finish up on the apsects of using the Object store in a real life solution that is a basic Page comments. In my previous article concerning ObjectStore I have described a way of storing and retrieving an object from the Store, which is fine and dandy if we know exactly the object’s OD, for example if we reference it from a page. But what good is a store like that if we cannot search it for content? The problem we were trying to solve using ObjectStore was storing comments for ANY Episerver page without having to do anything to the page type. We might need that for the upcoming project so the discovery may prove useful since this is a really neat way of storing objects.

So the class that we are going to store needs to persists the following values:

namespace Cognifide.EPiServerTest.ObjectStore
{
    [Serializable, XmlInclude(typeof (PageCommentDO))]
    public class PageCommentDO : IItem, IPageComment
    {
        private object id;
        private string name;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private int pageId;
        private string title;
        private string content;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private DateTime submitDate;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private bool moderated;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private bool published = true;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private bool reported;
 
    }
}

 You might have noticed that contrary to what I did before this class has some of its fields tagged with [Indexed(true)] attribute. This is required by the store object if we ever want to query the store for the class using those fields as a filtering criteria. The page also implements the required IItem interface (although the properties required by the interface are not shown in the excerpt) as well as our internal IPageComment which is added there for the purpose of easy switching of implementations. We intend to implement it on both ObjectStore and using NHibernate to make sure we get the best performance possible out of our solution. This interface is to allow us to easily switch between the 2 implementations.

Back to the ObjectStore

 First we need to introduce a few new classes EPiServer uses for querying the Store. The namespace that scopes the querying consists of the following entities: 

namespace EPiServer.BaseLibrary.Search
{    
    public class BetweenExpression : IExpression;
    public class EqualExpression : IExpression;
    public sealed class Expression;
    public interface IExpression;
    public class Order;
    public class Query : IEnumerable;
}

The Query class is at the center of any search in the Store, let’s start with the samples right away. The saving is almost identical to the sample that I’ve shown in my previous article:

public void Save()
{
    ISession session = null;
    try
    {
        // check if there is a schema for the type, if not create it.
        if (Context.Repository.SchemaForType(GetType()) == null)
        {
            TypeSchemaBuilder.RegisterSchemaAndType("CognifidePageCommentsStorage", GetType());
        }
 
        // get a new session from the current context.
        session = Context.Repository.CreateSession();
 
        // wrap it in a transaction 
        session.BeginTransaction();
 
        // make sure the id has been defined.
        if (Id.Equals(Guid.Empty))
        {
            Id = Guid.NewGuid();
        }
 
        //persist
        session.Save(this);
        session.CommitTransaction();
    }
    catch (ElektroPostException exception)
    {
        // ... rollback the transaction and do some reporting
        if (session != null)
        {
            session.RollbackTransaction();
        }
        throw;
    }
    finally
    {
        if (session != null)
        {
            session.Close();
        }
    }
}

Really there is not much meat there. The interesting part comes in the object retrieval. Even though the Search namespace does not look like it offers much, you can still build a fairly fophisticated filter with it. following code retrieves comments for a specific PageLinkID. The comments can be filtered by date and since the call is used to retrieve the page for viewing, we probably only want the ones that are public (meaning they have not been removed by the comment moderator).

 

public static List<PageCommentDO> GetCommentsForPage(int pageId, 
    DateTime beforeDate, DateTime afterDate, bool includeOnlyPublished)
{
    ISession session = null;
 
    try
    {
        // make sure there is a schema to read from, otherwise there is no point
        if (Context.Repository.SchemaForType( typeof (PageCommentDO)) == null)
        {
            return null;
        }
 
        //acquire a session
        session = Context.Repository.CreateSession();
 
        //create the query 
        Query query = new Query(typeof (PageCommentDO));
 
        // we only want comments for a singler page 
        query.Add(Expression.Equal("pageId", pageId));
 
        // should we filter to only wshow comments from some set time period?
        // the following demonstrate how to request a value from within a range
        if ((beforeDate != DateTime.MinValue) ||
            ((afterDate != DateTime.MaxValue) && (afterDate != DateTime.MinValue)))
        {
            query.Add(
                Expression.Between("submitDate",
                                   (beforeDate != DateTime.MinValue) ? beforeDate : new DateTime(0x76c, 1, 1),
                                   ((afterDate != DateTime.MinValue) && (afterDate != DateTime.MaxValue))
                                       ? afterDate
                                       : new DateTime(0x834, 1, 1)));
        }
 
        // probably for a displayed page we will only want to show published comments
        if (includeOnlyPublished)
        {
            query.Add(Expression.Equal("published", true));
        }
 
        // order the comments by date/time so that we get the most recent first
        query.AddOrder(new Order("submitDate", true));
 
        IList list = session.ExecuteQueryObject(query);
        List<PageCommentDO> result = new List<PageCommentDO>(list.Count);
        foreach (object item in list)
        {
            result.Add((PageCommentDO) item);
        }
        return result;
    }
    catch (ElektroPostException ex)
    {
        // ... do some reporting
        throw;
    }
    finally
    {
        if (session != null)
        {
            session.Close();
        }
    }
}

You nahe to agree, this really IS neat. All you need to do now to place the comments on a page is a few lines of code to bind the data from the Store with a repeated of a kind, and a set of edit boxes with a submit button :)

This is basically how much code the submission and retrieval the comments comment take:

// Load the comments to a repeater
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
        List<PageCommentDO> comments = 
            PageCommentDO.GetCommentsForPage(CurrentPage.PageLink.ID, DateTime.MinValue, DateTime.MaxValue);
        CurrentComments.DataSource = comments;
        CurrentComments.DataBind();
}
 
// Comment submission
protected void SubmitComment(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
    PageCommentDO newComment = new
        PageCommentDO(Guid.Empty,
        string.Format("CommentForPage{0}", CurrentPage.PageLink.ID),
        CurrentPage.PageLink.ID,
        SubjectTextBox.Text, ContentTextBox.Text, DateTime.Now, false, true, false);
    newComment.Save();
}
 
// the data binding for the labels
protected void CurrentComments_ItemDataBound(object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e)
{
    PageCommentDO comment = (e.Item.DataItem as PageCommentDO);
 
    Label commentSubjectLabel = (Label)e.Item.FindControl("CommentSubjectLabel");
    if (comment != null)
    {
        commentSubjectLabel.Text = comment.Title;
    }
 
    Label commentContentLabel = (Label)e.Item.FindControl("CommentContentLabel");
    if (comment != null)
    {
        commentContentLabel.Text = comment.Content;
    }
}

Short of having a control pre=built for you I cannot think of it being able to make it easier.

I will look into packing it into a nice control that we would be looking into contributing some time in the future and of course if there is actually a demand for it.

EPiServer?s ObjectStore (Part 2)

I think we’re mostly finished investigating ObjectStore for now. In this article I’ll try to finish up on the apsects of using the Object store in a real life solution that is a basic Page comments. In my previous article concerning ObjectStore I have described a way of storing and retrieving an object from the Store, which is fine and dandy if we know exactly the object’s OD, for example if we reference it from a page. But what good is a store like that if we cannot search it for content? The problem we were trying to solve using ObjectStore was storing comments for ANY Episerver page without having to do anything to the page type. We might need that for the upcoming project so the discovery may prove useful since this is a really neat way of storing objects.

So the class that we are going to store needs to persists the following values:

namespace Cognifide.EPiServerTest.ObjectStore
{
    [Serializable, XmlInclude(typeof (PageCommentDO))]
    public class PageCommentDO : IItem, IPageComment
    {
        private object id;
        private string name;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private int pageId;
        private string title;
        private string content;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private DateTime submitDate;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private bool moderated;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private bool published = true;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private bool reported;
 
    }
}

 You might have noticed that contrary to what I did before this class has some of its fields tagged with [Indexed(true)] attribute. This is required by the store object if we ever want to query the store for the class using those fields as a filtering criteria. The page also implements the required IItem interface (although the properties required by the interface are not shown in the excerpt) as well as our internal IPageComment which is added there for the purpose of easy switching of implementations. We intend to implement it on both ObjectStore and using NHibernate to make sure we get the best performance possible out of our solution. This interface is to allow us to easily switch between the 2 implementations.

Back to the ObjectStore

 First we need to introduce a few new classes EPiServer uses for querying the Store. The namespace that scopes the querying consists of the following entities: 

namespace EPiServer.BaseLibrary.Search
{    
    public class BetweenExpression : IExpression;
    public class EqualExpression : IExpression;
    public sealed class Expression;
    public interface IExpression;
    public class Order;
    public class Query : IEnumerable;
}

The Query class is at the center of any search in the Store, let’s start with the samples right away. The saving is almost identical to the sample that I’ve shown in my previous article:

public void Save()
{
    ISession session = null;
    try
    {
        // check if there is a schema for the type, if not create it.
        if (Context.Repository.SchemaForType(GetType()) == null)
        {
            TypeSchemaBuilder.RegisterSchemaAndType("CognifidePageCommentsStorage", GetType());
        }
 
        // get a new session from the current context.
        session = Context.Repository.CreateSession();
 
        // wrap it in a transaction 
        session.BeginTransaction();
 
        // make sure the id has been defined.
        if (Id.Equals(Guid.Empty))
        {
            Id = Guid.NewGuid();
        }
 
        //persist
        session.Save(this);
        session.CommitTransaction();
    }
    catch (ElektroPostException exception)
    {
        // ... rollback the transaction and do some reporting
        if (session != null)
        {
            session.RollbackTransaction();
        }
        throw;
    }
    finally
    {
        if (session != null)
        {
            session.Close();
        }
    }
}

Really there is not much meat there. The interesting part comes in the object retrieval. Even though the Search namespace does not look like it offers much, you can still build a fairly fophisticated filter with it. following code retrieves comments for a specific PageLinkID. The comments can be filtered by date and since the call is used to retrieve the page for viewing, we probably only want the ones that are public (meaning they have not been removed by the comment moderator).

 

public static List<PageCommentDO> GetCommentsForPage(int pageId, 
    DateTime beforeDate, DateTime afterDate, bool includeOnlyPublished)
{
    ISession session = null;
 
    try
    {
        // make sure there is a schema to read from, otherwise there is no point
        if (Context.Repository.SchemaForType( typeof (PageCommentDO)) == null)
        {
            return null;
        }
 
        //acquire a session
        session = Context.Repository.CreateSession();
 
        //create the query 
        Query query = new Query(typeof (PageCommentDO));
 
        // we only want comments for a singler page 
        query.Add(Expression.Equal("pageId", pageId));
 
        // should we filter to only wshow comments from some set time period?
        // the following demonstrate how to request a value from within a range
        if ((beforeDate != DateTime.MinValue) ||
            ((afterDate != DateTime.MaxValue) && (afterDate != DateTime.MinValue)))
        {
            query.Add(
                Expression.Between("submitDate",
                                   (beforeDate != DateTime.MinValue) ? beforeDate : new DateTime(0x76c, 1, 1),
                                   ((afterDate != DateTime.MinValue) && (afterDate != DateTime.MaxValue))
                                       ? afterDate
                                       : new DateTime(0x834, 1, 1)));
        }
 
        // probably for a displayed page we will only want to show published comments
        if (includeOnlyPublished)
        {
            query.Add(Expression.Equal("published", true));
        }
 
        // order the comments by date/time so that we get the most recent first
        query.AddOrder(new Order("submitDate", true));
 
        IList list = session.ExecuteQueryObject(query);
        List<PageCommentDO> result = new List<PageCommentDO>(list.Count);
        foreach (object item in list)
        {
            result.Add((PageCommentDO) item);
        }
        return result;
    }
    catch (ElektroPostException ex)
    {
        // ... do some reporting
        throw;
    }
    finally
    {
        if (session != null)
        {
            session.Close();
        }
    }
}

You nahe to agree, this really IS neat. All you need to do now to place the comments on a page is a few lines of code to bind the data from the Store with a repeated of a kind, and a set of edit boxes with a submit button :)

This is basically how much code the submission and retrieval the comments comment take:

// Load the comments to a repeater
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
        List<PageCommentDO> comments = 
            PageCommentDO.GetCommentsForPage(CurrentPage.PageLink.ID, DateTime.MinValue, DateTime.MaxValue);
        CurrentComments.DataSource = comments;
        CurrentComments.DataBind();
}
 
// Comment submission
protected void SubmitComment(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
    PageCommentDO newComment = new
        PageCommentDO(Guid.Empty,
        string.Format("CommentForPage{0}", CurrentPage.PageLink.ID),
        CurrentPage.PageLink.ID,
        SubjectTextBox.Text, ContentTextBox.Text, DateTime.Now, false, true, false);
    newComment.Save();
}
 
// the data binding for the labels
protected void CurrentComments_ItemDataBound(object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e)
{
    PageCommentDO comment = (e.Item.DataItem as PageCommentDO);
 
    Label commentSubjectLabel = (Label)e.Item.FindControl("CommentSubjectLabel");
    if (comment != null)
    {
        commentSubjectLabel.Text = comment.Title;
    }
 
    Label commentContentLabel = (Label)e.Item.FindControl("CommentContentLabel");
    if (comment != null)
    {
        commentContentLabel.Text = comment.Content;
    }
}

Short of having a control pre=built for you I cannot think of it being able to make it easier.

I will look into packing it into a nice control that we would be looking into contributing some time in the future and of course if there is actually a demand for it.

EPiServer’s ObjectStore (Part 2)

I think we’re mostly finished investigating ObjectStore for now. In this article I’ll try to finish up on the apsects of using the Object store in a real life solution that is a basic Page comments. In my previous article concerning ObjectStore I have described a way of storing and retrieving an object from the Store, which is fine and dandy if we know exactly the object’s OD, for example if we reference it from a page. But what good is a store like that if we cannot search it for content? The problem we were trying to solve using ObjectStore was storing comments for ANY Episerver page without having to do anything to the page type. We might need that for the upcoming project so the discovery may prove useful since this is a really neat way of storing objects.

So the class that we are going to store needs to persists the following values:

namespace Cognifide.EPiServerTest.ObjectStore
{
    [Serializable, XmlInclude(typeof (PageCommentDO))]
    public class PageCommentDO : IItem, IPageComment
    {
        private object id;
        private string name;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private int pageId;
        private string title;
        private string content;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private DateTime submitDate;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private bool moderated;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private bool published = true;
        [Indexed(true)]
        private bool reported;
 
    }
}

 You might have noticed that contrary to what I did before this class has some of its fields tagged with [Indexed(true)] attribute. This is required by the store object if we ever want to query the store for the class using those fields as a filtering criteria. The page also implements the required IItem interface (although the properties required by the interface are not shown in the excerpt) as well as our internal IPageComment which is added there for the purpose of easy switching of implementations. We intend to implement it on both ObjectStore and using NHibernate to make sure we get the best performance possible out of our solution. This interface is to allow us to easily switch between the 2 implementations.

Back to the ObjectStore

 First we need to introduce a few new classes EPiServer uses for querying the Store. The namespace that scopes the querying consists of the following entities: 

namespace EPiServer.BaseLibrary.Search
{    
    public class BetweenExpression : IExpression;
    public class EqualExpression : IExpression;
    public sealed class Expression;
    public interface IExpression;
    public class Order;
    public class Query : IEnumerable;
}

The Query class is at the center of any search in the Store, let’s start with the samples right away. The saving is almost identical to the sample that I’ve shown in my previous article:

public void Save()
{
    ISession session = null;
    try
    {
        // check if there is a schema for the type, if not create it.
        if (Context.Repository.SchemaForType(GetType()) == null)
        {
            TypeSchemaBuilder.RegisterSchemaAndType("CognifidePageCommentsStorage", GetType());
        }
 
        // get a new session from the current context.
        session = Context.Repository.CreateSession();
 
        // wrap it in a transaction 
        session.BeginTransaction();
 
        // make sure the id has been defined.
        if (Id.Equals(Guid.Empty))
        {
            Id = Guid.NewGuid();
        }
 
        //persist
        session.Save(this);
        session.CommitTransaction();
    }
    catch (ElektroPostException exception)
    {
        // ... rollback the transaction and do some reporting
        if (session != null)
        {
            session.RollbackTransaction();
        }
        throw;
    }
    finally
    {
        if (session != null)
        {
            session.Close();
        }
    }
}

Really there is not much meat there. The interesting part comes in the object retrieval. Even though the Search namespace does not look like it offers much, you can still build a fairly fophisticated filter with it. following code retrieves comments for a specific PageLinkID. The comments can be filtered by date and since the call is used to retrieve the page for viewing, we probably only want the ones that are public (meaning they have not been removed by the comment moderator).

 

public static List<PageCommentDO> GetCommentsForPage(int pageId, 
    DateTime beforeDate, DateTime afterDate, bool includeOnlyPublished)
{
    ISession session = null;
 
    try
    {
        // make sure there is a schema to read from, otherwise there is no point
        if (Context.Repository.SchemaForType( typeof (PageCommentDO)) == null)
        {
            return null;
        }
 
        //acquire a session
        session = Context.Repository.CreateSession();
 
        //create the query 
        Query query = new Query(typeof (PageCommentDO));
 
        // we only want comments for a singler page 
        query.Add(Expression.Equal("pageId", pageId));
 
        // should we filter to only wshow comments from some set time period?
        // the following demonstrate how to request a value from within a range
        if ((beforeDate != DateTime.MinValue) ||
            ((afterDate != DateTime.MaxValue) && (afterDate != DateTime.MinValue)))
        {
            query.Add(
                Expression.Between("submitDate",
                                   (beforeDate != DateTime.MinValue) ? beforeDate : new DateTime(0x76c, 1, 1),
                                   ((afterDate != DateTime.MinValue) && (afterDate != DateTime.MaxValue))
                                       ? afterDate
                                       : new DateTime(0x834, 1, 1)));
        }
 
        // probably for a displayed page we will only want to show published comments
        if (includeOnlyPublished)
        {
            query.Add(Expression.Equal("published", true));
        }
 
        // order the comments by date/time so that we get the most recent first
        query.AddOrder(new Order("submitDate", true));
 
        IList list = session.ExecuteQueryObject(query);
        List<PageCommentDO> result = new List<PageCommentDO>(list.Count);
        foreach (object item in list)
        {
            result.Add((PageCommentDO) item);
        }
        return result;
    }
    catch (ElektroPostException ex)
    {
        // ... do some reporting
        throw;
    }
    finally
    {
        if (session != null)
        {
            session.Close();
        }
    }
}

You nahe to agree, this really IS neat. All you need to do now to place the comments on a page is a few lines of code to bind the data from the Store with a repeated of a kind, and a set of edit boxes with a submit button :)

This is basically how much code the submission and retrieval the comments comment take:

// Load the comments to a repeater
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
        List<PageCommentDO> comments = 
            PageCommentDO.GetCommentsForPage(CurrentPage.PageLink.ID, DateTime.MinValue, DateTime.MaxValue);
        CurrentComments.DataSource = comments;
        CurrentComments.DataBind();
}
 
// Comment submission
protected void SubmitComment(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
    PageCommentDO newComment = new
        PageCommentDO(Guid.Empty,
        string.Format("CommentForPage{0}", CurrentPage.PageLink.ID),
        CurrentPage.PageLink.ID,
        SubjectTextBox.Text, ContentTextBox.Text, DateTime.Now, false, true, false);
    newComment.Save();
}
 
// the data binding for the labels
protected void CurrentComments_ItemDataBound(object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e)
{
    PageCommentDO comment = (e.Item.DataItem as PageCommentDO);
 
    Label commentSubjectLabel = (Label)e.Item.FindControl("CommentSubjectLabel");
    if (comment != null)
    {
        commentSubjectLabel.Text = comment.Title;
    }
 
    Label commentContentLabel = (Label)e.Item.FindControl("CommentContentLabel");
    if (comment != null)
    {
        commentContentLabel.Text = comment.Content;
    }
}

Short of having a control pre=built for you I cannot think of it being able to make it easier.

I will look into packing it into a nice control that we would be looking into contributing some time in the future and of course if there is actually a demand for it.

EpiServer on Vista

EPiServer developer-to-developer forum holds an article on how to make EPiServer 4.61 run on Vista. I suspect that EPiServer CMS (a.k.a. EPiServer 5) will not have any of the described problems, but in the mean time I’m happily hacking my EPiServer on my other machine as well.

I’ve managed most of the way before and had the server running here, but it was having all sorts of problems, which are all gone after applying the suggestions (especially in the second post).

Posted in EPiServer, Software Development, Vista
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...
| Leave a Comment »

EPiServer’s ObjectStore

We’ve been looking at the way to efficiently store a lis of quotes some time ago. And Steve suggested that if we’re to store a gian number of quotes, we may look into some misterious being called ObjectStore…

If there will be many qoutes, e.g. you buy a “100.000 quotes of the day” database, you might want to put them into a separate table in the database. Seasoned EPiServer developers tend to think that everything can be stored as pages in EPiServer, which is kind of true, but not necessarily wise.

Another option could be to store the quotes in the ObjectStore, the general EPiServer storage feature, which can hold about anything you’d like, efficiently, quickly restorable, searchable, indexable, highly available and environmentally safe. It might even solve the global warming problem while we’re at it. Ok, maybe not. Truthfully, only a few developers outside of EPiServer know how to use it, and quite alot of us inside have no clue whatsoever. But, the tales I’ve heard about it would nominate it as a prime candidate for a quote system like this. Right now, it is storing things like XForms definitions and data, WSRP stuff, Content Mirroring data and lots more. It’s been around since 4.50 (I think) and is said to be documented – eventually, until then I guess we’ll have to resort to other ways of doing things.

MmmMmm… tasty!

Research mode “ON”.

There is no documentation, allright, but there is Reflector. Between the reflector and the sample server, there can be no secrets that can hide form us :)

Basically the ObjectStore is a way of persisting any serializable object (with some minor adjustments).

  • Object store is divided into Schemas.
  • A schema seems to be way of grouping types of objects into easily manageabble pools
  • A class type has to be contained within a schema to be persisted.
  • A type needs to be registered within a schema before you can write to it.
  • A type needs to implement EPiServer.BaseLibrary.IItem interface and be marked as Serializable for the ObjectStore to be able to serve it.

The Research Field

The namespaces of your interest is EPiServer.BaseLibrary, namely the following parts of it:

namespace EPiServer.BaseLibrary
{
public sealed class Context
public interface IContext
public interface IItem
public interface IItemList : IEnumerable
public interface IObjectStore
public interface IRepository
public interface ISession
}

Then you may want to open EPiServer.XForms.XFormData and EPiServer.XForms.XForm especially the Save() method of the latter is very educating.

The code for the ObjectStore implementation lives in the EPiServer.Implementation namespace but having all the interfaces exposed its implementation details should not be of our concern. Suffice to say itseems to be flexible ane extensible. You can have it sitting on an Oracle & Microsoft SQL Server databases as well as having it stored In an XML file. I assume there would not be much trouble replacing the object store looking as the Logging service has it setup dynamically through settings in its config file.

The results

  • The class you want to persist should inherit IItem and be serializable.
  • The default repository is stored in the Context and is capable of creating more sessions for us
  • Bah, enough of the bulleted lists… let the code speak for itself…

using System;

using System.Collections.Generic;

using System.Text;

using EPiServer.Implementation;

using EPiServer.Implementation.Serialization;

using EPiServer.BaseLibrary;

using System.Xml.Serialization;

 

namespace Cognifide.EPiServerTest.ObjectStore

{

    [Serializable, XmlInclude(typeof(CogObjectStoreItem))]

    public class CogObjectStoreItem : IItem

    {

 

        string data;

        private object id;

        private string name;

 

        public object Id

        {

            get { return this.id; }

            set { this.id = value; }

        }

        public string Name

        {

            get { return this.name; }

            set { this.name = value; }

        }

 

        public CogObjectStoreItem(object id, string name, string data)

        {

            this.data = data;

            this.id = id;

            this.name = name;

        }

 

        public void Save()

        {

            ISession session = null;

            try

            {

                // check if there is a schema for the type, if not create it.

                if (Context.Repository.SchemaForType(this.GetType()) == null)

                {

                    TypeSchemaBuilder.RegisterSchemaAndType

                        (“CogObjectStoreItem”, this.GetType());

                }

 

                // get a new session from the current context.

                session = Context.Repository.CreateSession();

 

                // wrap it in a transaction

                session.BeginTransaction();

 

                // make sure the id has been defined.

                if (this.Id.Equals(Guid.Empty))

                {

                    this.Id = Guid.NewGuid();

                }

 

                //persist

                session.Save(this);

                session.CommitTransaction();

            }

            catch (ElektroPostException exception)

            {

                // … rollback the transaction and do some reporting

                session.RollbackTransaction();

                throw exception;

            }

            finally

            {

                if (session != null)

                {

                    session.Close();

                }

            }

        }

 

        public static CogObjectStoreItem Load(object Id)

        {

            ISession session = null;

            try

            {

                // make sure there is a schema to read from.

                if (Context.Repository.SchemaForType(typeof(CogObjectStoreItem))==null)

                {

                    return null;

                }

 

                //acquire a session

                session = Context.Repository.CreateSession();

 

                // … and load the object

                return (CogObjectStoreItem)session.Load(Id);

            }

            catch (ElektroPostException exception)

            {

                // … do some reporting

                throw exception;

            }

            finally

            {

                if (session != null)

                {

                    session.Close();

                }

            }

        }

        public override string ToString()

        {

            return this.id.ToString();

        }

 

    }

}

The Conclusion

ObjectStore seems like a kind of Hibernate surrogate, the cool thing is that you can create the stored data without modifying the database schema, the not so cool is that there may be a serious penalty for bigger structures and I suspect there might be issues with speed for large data sets since the searching technique implemented seems to require that the objects be de-serialized to be checked if the match the filter.

Mateusz is going to test its performance over the following days to decide if it’s going to perform with what we need it for and I’ll try to see if I can get some hints for solving our problem on the EPiServer developer forums. But then again, even if it’s nto going to be our solution it may still prove useful for other issues.

Posted in C#, EPiServer
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.50 out of 5)
Loading...
| 27 Comments »

Since IIS on XP seems to be handling only one site at a time and I have multiple installations of EpiServer for different purposes on my machine I needed a fast way of switching between them.

Sure I could go to the administration console and do it manually, but hey, why waste 30 seconds every time you do it when you can actually batch waste them in a chunk of half an hour to automate it.

so here’s my findings.

The adsutil.vbs is the script you want to get intalled on your system somewhere in the search path. %systemroot% will do.
You will find the script on your XP CD in the \i386 folder. Unpack with the following command:

expand E:\i386\adsutil.vb_ %SystemRoot%\adsutil.vbs

Assuming that E: is your CR-ROM drive.

You can find the user’s reference for the script on the Microsoft page

You may want to make sure that your Episerver is running in the default location by using the following call:

Cscript.exe %SystemRoot%\adsutil.vbs SET /W3SVC/1/ROOT

But since you’re probably having only one web server running on your machine anyway (why would you read it otherwise) probably the only thing you really need to do is:

Cscript.exe %SystemRoot%\adsutil.vbs SET /W3SVC/1/ROOT “C:\Inetpub\MyEPiServer###”

Another great tool I use that’s actually built into windows is reg.exe. this tool actually allows you to modify registry from command line. this was actually my initial approach to changing the path. It didn’t succeed to actually change the IIS root – but still it did the modification to the registry (that IIS just merrily ignored).

reg.exe ADD “HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W3SVC\Parameters\Virtual Roots” /v “/” /d “C:\Inetpub\MyEPiServer###,,201” /t REG_SZ /f

This is however good for changing some database settings if anything is stored in the registry before restarting the IIS, which is can be scripted as:

net stop W3svc
net start W3svc

So to summarize… my script for switching sites ends as:

@echo off

set root_folder=C:\Inetpub\MyEPiServer2\
set adscript_location=%SystemRoot%\adsutil.vbs

echo Switching IIS to %root_folder%
Cscript.exe %adscript_location% SET /W3SVC/1/ROOT “%root_folder%”
net stop W3svc
net start W3svc

Posted in ASP.NET, EPiServer, Internet Information Services
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...
| 9 Comments »

Google Map Control and why EPiServer is so cool!

I’ve recently had a chance to write a Google Maps control for EPiServer, it’s still somewhat buggy and I’m still considering how to release it since it still contains some java script that is potentially GPL infected and I would not like to contaminate someone’s code with it. I may end up rewriting it to some extent or make it more server side so that it’s completely ASP based.

Anyway…

We’ve started working on the rewrite of our site internally in a few CMS’es basically creating an internal competition on which of the engines/teams can do the best the easiest and the fastest site. I can say honestly, EPiServer has been a blast! Virtually any control we’ve decided to place there was almost completely effortless. The controls that are delivered (with sample usage on the demo site) just seem to cover everything. Well, almost everything. There is no map creation component as far as I can tell.

I’ve been wanting to write this control for quite a while and since I deployed a wiki for my family and started filling it in. I had a really nice experience with this Google Map extension to the MediaWiki. I wanted us to have the same on our site. And in the mean time we’ve started running into some limitations that required us to write some plugins for the editor’s site of the CMS. Striking two birds with one stone, here comes the Google Maps for EpiServer.

Anyone familiar with EpiServer knows that the CMS allows you to define the content on any given page through a set of properties defined for its page type. There is a handful of those, and each of them comes with a specific editor. Some of them even come with so called DOPE (Dynamic-on-page-editing). This feature is really so cool that by itself it’s probably one of the driving selling factor. I wanted it all!

To deliver it you need to inherit a property, (in my case I decided to go with a LongString as I can easily go over the 255 char limit if the user woudl decide to have more than a couple of flagpoints on his/her map) and define its editors.

I’ve found out that the property can be easily integrated with the CMS (virtually without any user intervention) by means of attributes/reflection. So here we go:

namespace Cognifide.EPiServerControls.GoogleMaps

{

  [global::EPiServer.PlugIn.PageDefinitionTypePlugIn(

    DisplayName = “GoogleMapData”, Description = “Google Map”)]

  public class GoogleMapProperty : EPiServer.Core.PropertyLongString

  {

   …

  }

}

Yay! one line of code and my class is a property and will show up in the system as one of the available data formats. Now how cool is that!?

The cool part of it is that now as it’s a property, it’s even easier to integrate it with the page.

<%@ Page language=”c#” Codebehind=”GoogleMapsPage.aspx.cs”

    AutoEventWireup=”True”

    Inherits=”development.Templates.GoogleMapsPage”

    MasterPageFile=”~/templates/MasterPages/MasterPage.master” %>

 

<%@ Register TagPrefix=”EPiServer”

    Namespace=”EPiServer.WebControls” Assembly=”EPiServer” %>

 

<asp:ContentContentPlaceHolderID=”MainRegion” runat=”server”>

  <EPiServer:Property ID=”MyGoogleMap” runat=”server”

  PropertyName=”GoogleMapData” />

</asp:Content>

That’s it! The CodeFile is practically empty, except for the autogenerated part. The property instance knows by itself that is should pull the data from the page property defined in “PropertyName”!

The control supports all 3 modes:

View Mode – obviously:

Google Map View

Edit mode – can’t do without it:

Google Map View

I initially planned to put the dope-like editing there but for some reason EPiServer scripts kept interfering with the JavaScript defined for the control. Didn’t give it too much thought though what I really wanted to work good is…

DOPE mode – this is probably the coolest thing in the whole deal:

Google Map View

The only problem I still have with the last mode is that most of the code for the DOPE mode I have is a modified version of what comes originally from the MediaWiki Google Map extension. Since JavaScript is not my core competence, I’ve only modified it to the extent that was needed for the code to work and therefore before save, you need to copy the dynamically generated code that’s just below the editing controls and into the edit box. Lame, I know. But I don’t really fancy learning Java Script further right now and it was not the point of this exercise. Perhaps if the control is released someone will be kind enough to fix and extend it so that it’s more streamlined.

Cognifide
The article is based on the knowledge I’ve gathered and work I’ve performed for Cognifide. Cognifide is an official partner EPiServer and the real contributor of the the control.

Posted in .Net Framework, ASP.NET, C#, EPiServer, Web applications
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...
| 24 Comments »

Microsoft loves programmers

I’ve just read a blog about a few new additions to C# 3.0 and in the context of what we’ve already learned about the whole “Orcas” project that is the simplest conclusion.

Microsoft .Net Framework designers and coders are just a bunch of programmers who you can clearly see enjoy hat they do. I can’t stress enough how many times I’ve been annoyed to be forced to wrap some private variables in the obvious public properties. No longer!

Instantiating a class followed by a bunch of setting of properties? Now done in one line. Shweet.

One may argue that C# is a set of such syntactic sugar. But then again, I am sure that’s why so many programmers really like it. Even some of the most Java oriented programmers (Yes Albert I’m looking at you!) in our company are looking forward to work on .Net.

It is the general perception here that, comparing to Eclipse, Visual Studio is a weak IDE in terms of pure code-writing-helpers, refactoring, and discovery of code dependencies. Only the next version will even be able to target more than 1 .net framework version… Please fix that crap… But the language designers are continually doing a great job.

Have a read on some:

Microsoft ,may be the most annoying company in any other context, though you can’t help but to feel that sweet and sticky loving goo leftover on your cursor avery time you flip a page….